now they have. but how many guys have ya put on a pedestal when they hadnt beaten anyone, and said shit like "the skill is obvious even if its against bums, you can see it. Shit, Spence still has just Brook on his resume and you guys slurpped him to no end way before he even entertained Brook.

_________________

Thats because Spence looks good in his fights. Even on a night when he doesnt look as good as usual "Brook" it still doesnt go 12. So ya, theres that. But you know this, you're just trying to grasp at straws.

The skill is obvious with Spence, its obvious with BJS, but to a lesser degree.

_________________

---

How do you know that a Nun got out of the wrong side of bed???

.....she has the Bishops shoes on!

Would be a fine thing if a top churchman was found sleeping with a grown woman!

Touche'. Carry on the BJS meat slurping. I just personally don't see that skill you are talking about, but am willing to admit to be wrong if he comes over here and proves it.

i dont see Jacobs being significantly better at all. just more power. Jacobs resume still sucks outside of a moral victory against Golovkin.

_________________

So you would pick BJS over Jacobs in a fight here?

I dont even think Jacobs IS significantly better. I just think as eluded to "more power" and as I eluded to a different style entirely different from Lemieux puts him over the top if they fight. More speed, more power, proven dog.

_________________

---

How do you know that a Nun got out of the wrong side of bed???

.....she has the Bishops shoes on!

Would be a fine thing if a top churchman was found sleeping with a grown woman!

its a pretty even fight IMO. on paper.

_________________

Well should that fight come about, I would be willing to take a test on that.